RD-ACTION: the new European Rare Disease Joint Action

RD-ACTION, the new Joint Action consisting of the member states of the European Union for rare diseases, was launched on 17 September in Luxembourg, under the auspices of John Ryan, Acting Director of the Health Division and Food Security (DG Health), Jacques Remacle, Head of Health CHAFEA unit (Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency) and Patrice Dosquet, representing the French Ministry of Health.
Following the two previous Joint Actions - Orphanet Joint Action and EUCERD - RD-ACTION represents renewed support of the European Commission (EC) to rare diseases, through its Directorate General for Health (DG SANTE). RD-ACTION has three main objectives:
- to contribute to the implementation, by member states, the recommendations of the EC Panel in relation to policies on these diseases,
- support the development of Orphanet and make it sustainable, and finally
- help Member States to introduce the ORPHA code in their health systems to make rare diseases visible.
With a global budget of €8,344,079, this work will last three years (until June 2018), following the logic of coherence and continuity vis-à-vis the previous actions, but aims to go further in terms of concrete implementation and consolidation policies.

This action is coordinated by Orphanet (INSERM), bringing together no less than 63 European and non-European participants. The responsibility of implementing the various actions will be carried out by Orphanet (Ana Rath), University of Newcastle (Kate Bushby, coordinator of the EUCERD Joint Action which just ended), the German Institute for Documentation and Medical Information DIMDI (Stefanie Weber), the University of Vienna (Till Voigtländer) and EURORDIS (Yann LeCam). The National Bank of Rare Diseases Data (BNDMR) represented by Rémy Choquet, will work towards the codification, notably the requirement of definition and bringing solutions to the Member States for the implementation of coding rare diseases. DIMDI and the Register of the Venetian region (Paola Facchin) will drive the implementation and testing of these solutions. EURORDIS will work towards dissemination actions along with Orphanet and Higher Health Institute (ISS, Italy). The dissemination actions include the 8th European Conference on Rare Diseases and Orphan Products, 26-28 May 2016, Edinburgh. The Directorate General of Health (DGS France, represented by Patrice Dosquet) will lead the work towards a financially sustainable European Orphanet database.
RD-ACTION was designed in the spirit of integration and coherence between the data produced by Orphanet, which provides, among others, the necessary analysis towards policy recommendations, and political action that will then guide the production, operation and dissemination of this data. Participants will ensure effective communication between the reality of each state and the EC Panel, in order to concretely support the implementation of their recommendations.
Read the European Commission press release on RD ACTION


The House of Representatives in Philippines recently approved a comprehensive policy on services for patients with rare diseases that will provide them with timely and adequate access to healthcare, information, and products to treat their conditions. This will be done primarily through the establishment of a comprehensive and sustainable health system for identification, referral, and management of patients with rare diseases—integrated within the current public health system; and the inclusion of rare disease benefit package in PhilHealth.
Almost all the guidelines published till date on genetic testing on children for adult onset conditions recommend deferring such tests unless there is a clear indication that it will prevent the future outcome of the condition. Whether the general public agrees with this recommendation is addressed in an article published in European Journal of Human Genetics.
Another article has studied an equally contentious issue –disclosure of incidental findings - is published in European Journal of Human Genetics. Here the authors also find that contrary to the recommendations of professional organisations, participants in next generation studies wanted disclosure of all incidental findings. The authors investigated if participants recruited from the Region of Southern Denmark want disclosure of incidental findings and which ones would they want to know more about. According to the authors most participants wanted disclosure of all incidental findings; only 3% did not want any disclosure, while 36% wanted disclosure only on actionable variants. According to the authors due to the disparity of opinion between the official recommendation and the sample studies “options for reporting IFs in research studies (could) be incorporated in the consent form.” 
A paper published in Portuguese presents information of the rare disease health policy in Brazil, using the example of Ostegenesis Imperfecta. The paper details the contradictions, especially with respect to therapeutic decisions and the strengthening of the specialized network for addressing this condition which are expressed in the drafting and final text of the new law. 
A perspective published by stakeholders in Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers comments on the current legislation mandating the United States Food and Drug Administration as the regulatory body overseeing Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs). 
The current state of newborn bloodspot screening in Australia and the lessons it needs to learn from international programmes to upgrade its operation is explained in Frontiers in Public Health. The authors say that NBS has been operating successfully in Australia for almost 50 years but currently it does not have any coherent national policy or decision-making process that is concurrently agreed by government. The authors describe the policy environment in the United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand which could provide useful information. In Australia the establishment of the Australian Screening Advisory Committee in 2001, now known as the Standing Committee on Screening has played an important role in providing guidance on what constitutes a good screening program through the development of the Population-Based Screening Framework in 2008. However, the authors believe that Australia is operating in an environment, which lacks a considered decision-making process for government, particularly in regards to assessing conditions for screening.






