In the era of personalised medicine, what counts as "rare"? Reflections from IRDiRC
Members of the International Rare Disease Research Consortium (IRDiRC)’s Scientific Therapies Committee have published an article in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, discussing how definitions of rare conditions are being impacted by the emergence of personalised medicine.
Currently, definitions of “rare” versus “common” diseases are typically based on a prevalence threshold in a given region. Additionally, diseases and disease groups are classified based primarily on clinical signs. However, as individualised pheno- and genotyping become more frequently used in medical practice, there are multiple opportunities for the definitions of rare diseases to shift. For example, it is becoming increasingly possible to define subsets of both rare and common diseases into rarer entities, based on more precise factors such as specific biomarkers or gene variants. Additionally, advances in molecular diagnosis could facilitate the grouping of different diseases which share a common, drug-targetable feature into a single condition.
Overall, the possibilities presented by personalised medicine could help improve the quality of treatment, care, and diagnosis available to patients with rare diseases if harnessed correctly. However, this requires that the scientific community reach a consensus on how rare diseases are defined. To this end, the authors recommend further work which expands on the points raised in this article.